Posts

Showing posts from 2021

NOT SEXIST, NOT MYSOGINIST, and definitely NOT A MOTHER HATER.- An Attempt at MorphoSyntactics to Derive Meaning

Never thought I had to do this, but if I didn’t, nobody else probably would. Here I present a very rudimentary morphosyntactic analysis of Duterte’s swearing behaviors, and give the obvious (to me) conclusion that he is NOT SEXIST, NOT MYSOGINIST, and definitely NOT A MOTHER HATER. Since linguistics is a rapidly progressing science, the terminology I employ might be unpopular or worse, outdated. Although currently the nominative-accusative vs. ergative-absolutist axes are still popular, the opinion that Philippine languages are rendered in the passive voice is considered passe; so taking a convenient way out, I prefer the generic employment of a generic category of focus as an easy solution to the sometime contentious debate about Tagalog and Bisaya (Duterte’s native language) being as being ergative.  “PUTANG INA KA” has a different meaning from “PUTANG INA MO”, although both are swear sentences. The latter is frequent among Tagalog speakers, but the first is more frequently used by n
 this weekend, let's suspend critical political analysis, and enjoy some intercultural music. found this unbelievable beautiful chad mitchell rendition of Moscow Nights, in russian!
Image
The State in Development Theory: The Philippines Under Marcos M. D. Litonjua Philippine Studies Vol. 49, No. 3 (Third Quarter 2001) , pp. 368-398 (31 pages) Published By: Ateneo de Manila University https://www. jstor .org /stable/42634449 this paper is an essay on why the Marcos regime was not a developmental state, and gives a measure of historical detail.  BUT THE SAME LOGIC CAN APPLY TO THE CORY AQUINO government, which purported to be a progressive, inclusivist democratic intervention against the dictatorship. One can ask why Cory refused, even with expert opinion of the UP School of Economics, in the person of her own NEDA Secretary to reform Hacienda Luisita.